« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 83, Issue 3
, Pages 251-255
, December 2003
Cervical ripening with oral misoprostol at term
References
- . Prolonged rupture of membranes at term. J Reprod Med. 1982;27:29–33
- . Role of the cervix in the induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:21–26
- . A randomized double blind trial of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:991–996
- . Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 methyl analog misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:332–336
- . A randomized trial of misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of labor: safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:387–391
-
.
Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent.
Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;100:641–644
- . Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:244–247
- . Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1811–1816
- . A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1804–1810
- . Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:541–544
- . Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:521–525
- . Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:633–642
-
.
A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized trial.
Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;108:1–4
- . Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral and vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:88–92
- . A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:481–486
- . Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:906–910
- . Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (prepidil gel): randomized comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1137–1142
- . A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1018–1023
- . Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:401–405
- . Cervical priming with oral misoprostol in pre-labor rupture of membranes at term. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:923–926
PII: S0020-7292(03)00275-3
doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00275-3
© 2003 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 83, Issue 3
, Pages 251-255
, December 2003
