International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 85, Issue 3 , Pages 267-269 , June 2004

Predictors of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section

  • C.A Cameron

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61-2-9351-7728; fax: +61-2-9351-7742
    • ,
  • C.L Roberts

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
    • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
    • ,
  • B Peat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Received 10 June 2003 ,Revised 8 September 2003 ,Accepted 10 September 2003.

References 

  1. Flamm BL. Vaginal birth after cesarean and the New England Journal of Medicine: a strange controversy. Birth. 2001;28(4):276–279
  2. O'Connor A, et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment of screening decisions. The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2003;
  3. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins . Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin. 1999;
  4. McMahon MJ, et al.  Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(10):689–695
  5. Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. Br Med J. 2001;322(7294):1089–1093 discussion 1093–1094

PII: S0020-7292(03)00435-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.09.002

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 85, Issue 3 , Pages 267-269 , June 2004

Article Tools