« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 88, Issue 3
, Pages 242-248
, March 2005
Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor
References
- . Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systemic review. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1999;106:798–803
- . Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997;89:633–642
- . Misoprostol and pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;344:38–47
- . Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in late pregnancy (Cochrane review). The cochrane library, issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 2002;
- . Oral administration of misoprostol for labour induction: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997;89:392–397
- . Oral misoprostol for induction of labour (Cochrane review). The cochrane library, issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 2002;
- . “African” is a rainbow word. S. Afr. Med. J. 1997;87:1
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The use of Electronic Fetal monitoring, Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Nr.8. London; 2001.
- . Uterine hyperstimulation. The need for standard terminology. J. Reprod. Med. 1987;32:91–95
- . Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;13:254–259
- . Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systemic review of the literature. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;43:475–488
- . A masked randomised comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998;92:481–486
- . A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999;280:1155–1160
- . A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomized trial. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2001;108:23–26
- . Dose variation that is associated with approximated one-quarter tablet doses of misoprostol. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;187:615–619
- . Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labour induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;188:162–167
- Hofmeyr GJ, Alferivic Z, Matonhodze B, Brocklehurst P, Campbell E, Nikodem VC. Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:952–9.
- . A benefit-risk assessment of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction. Drug Safety. 2001;25:665–676
- . Cervical ripening and induction of labour with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;186:1124–1129
- . Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;96:465–469
- . Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;99:201–205
- . Prostaglandin E2 preparations for preinduction cervical ripening. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;43:469–474
- . In vitro characterization of prostonoid receptors on human myometrium at term pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1993;108:501–506
- . Comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol on uterine activity. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999;93:275–280
- . Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997;90:88–92
PII: S0020-7292(04)00492-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.005
© 2004 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 88, Issue 3
, Pages 242-248
, March 2005
