International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 253-257, March 2005

Re-laparotomy after Cesarean section

  • J.D. Seffah

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +233 21 668425; fax: +233 21 665648.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ghana Medical School box 4236, Accra, Ghana

Received 13 August 2004; received in revised form 16 December 2004; accepted 22 December 2004.

Abstract 

Objective

The objective of the study was to find out the indications for management and the outcomes of reopening the abdomen during the puerperium after Cesarean section.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective descriptive survey at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana.

Results

There were 6120 Cesarean sections (17%) out of a total of 36,010 deliveries. Re-laparotomy was done in 44 patients (0.7%) of the Cesarean sections. The indications were: hemorrhage from uterine atony, hemorrhage from placental bed after operation for placenta previa, uterine sepsis with hemorrhage, hemorrhage after Cesarean section, myomectomy and hemorrhage from anterior abdominal wound dehiscence. The main surgeries performed were: hysterectomy, ligation of ascending branches of uterine arteries, ligation of hypogastric arteries, debridement and re-suturing of the uterine incision and secondary suturing of anterior abdominal wall. There were 6 near missed fatalities. There were 4 mortalities caused by excessive hemorrhage and severe sepsis.

Conclusion

The case fatality rate for re-laparotomy after Cesarean section is high (9%). Near missed-fatalities are common. To reduce the unfavorable outcomes, instituting more intensive education on the use of the partograph should prevent prolonged labor. Centers carrying out Cesarean section should have efficient blood transfusion service in place.

Keywords: Cesarean section, Re-laparotomy, Near-missed fatality, Mortality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7292(05)00023-8

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.014

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 253-257, March 2005