International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 246-251, December 2005

Comparison of the efficacy of Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Science, Yonsei University, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Received 1 July 2005; received in revised form 22 August 2005; accepted 24 August 2005.

Abstract 

Objective: To compare the cure rate and confirm the clinical efficacy of the 3 most frequently performed surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: Between January 2001 and May 2003, 92 women with SUI were randomly assigned to undergo the Burch colposuspension (n=33), pubovaginal sling (n=28), or tension-free vaginal tape (n=31) at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Patient characteristics, urodynamic study results, cure rates at 3, 6, and 12 months, and complication rates were compared using the χ2 test. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the cure rates initially, but after 12 months the cure rate of the pubovaginal sling procedure was found to be significantly higher than those of the tension-free vaginal tape or Burch colposuspension procedures. Conclusion: The cure rate of the pubovaginal sling procedure was significantly higher after 1 year, but no difference in efficacy was observed between the 2 other procedures. A randomized prospective study of a larger population should be conducted.

Keywords: Stress urinary incontinence, Burch colposuspension, Pubovaginal sling operation, Tension-free vaginal tape

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7292(05)00489-3

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.023

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 246-251, December 2005