« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 96, Issue 3
, Pages 212-218
, March 2007
Alternatives to mifepristone for early medical abortion
References
- . In: Medical management of abortion. ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines. vol. 67:Washington, DC: ACOG; 2005;
- WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion II: side effects and women's perceptions. BJOG. 2004;111(7):715–725
- The efficacy of medical abortion: a meta-analysis. Contraception. 2000;61:29–40
- . Acceptability and feasibility of early pregnancy termination by mifepristone-misoprostol. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:360–365
- . Analysis of failure in medical abortion. Contraception. 1996;54:323–327
- . Comparison of gameprost and vaginal misoprostol in first trimester mifepristone induced abortion. Contraception. 2005;72:28–32
- . In: Induction of labor with misoprostol. ACOG committee opinion. vol. 228:Washington, DC: ACOG; 1999;
- . New U.S. Food and Drug Administration Labeling on Cytotec (misoprostol) use and pregnancy. In: ACOG committee opinion on obstetric practice. vol. 283:Washington, DC: ACOG; 2003;
- . Misoprostol for third stage of labour. Lancet. 1996;347:1257
- . Misoprostol and pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(1):38–60
- . Role of sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening to vacuum aspiration in first trimester interruption of pregnancy. Contraception. 2003;67(3):213–217
- Oral and vaginal misoprostol 800 mcg every 8 h for early abortion. Contraception. 2003;67:457–462
- . Epidemiological assessment of misoprostol teratogenicity. BJOG. 2000;107:519–523
- . Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:88–92
- Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC. Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol. Human Reproduction 2002;17:332-6.
- . Comparison of misoprostol plasma concentration following buccal and sublingual administration. Contraception. 2005;71:22–25
- WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion I: Efficacy. BJOG. 2003;110(9):808–818
- . Comparing vaginal and buccal misoprostol when used after methotrexate for early abortion. Contraception. 2004;70:463–466
- Randomized trial of mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol for abortion through 56 days of last menstrual period. Contraception. 2005;72:328–332
- . Induction of abortion with mifepristone (RU 486) and oral or vaginal misoprostol. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:983–987
- . Vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion up to 9 weeks of gestation: efficacy and acceptability. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(5):1159–1162
- . A randomized trial of saline solution-moistened misoprostol versus dry misoprostol for first-trimester pregnancy failure. Contraception. 2004;190:389–394
- . A randomized trial of the effect of moistening misoprostol before vaginal administration when used with methotrexate for abortion. Contraception. 1999;5911–5916
- . Medical management of tubal pregnancy. In: Clinical management guidelines. vol. 3:1998;
- . Oral methotrexate and vaginal misoprostol for early abortion. Contraception. 1998;57:83–88
- . Medical abortion with oral methotrexate and vaginal misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:611–616
- . Early medical abortion with methotrexate and misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(1):11–16
- . Efficacy and safety of single-dose systemic methotrexate in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:716–721
- . 25 mg or 50 mg of oral methotrexate followed by vaginal misoprostol 7 days after for early abortion: a randomized trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47:182–187
- . A viable alternative to surgical vacuum aspiration: repeated doses of intravaginal misoprostol over 9 hours for medical terminations of pregnancies up to 8 weeks. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110:175–180
- Early pregnancy termination with vaginal misoprostol before and after 42 days of gestation. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(12):3079–3083
- . A prospective randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1477–1482
- . Early pregnancy termination with vaginal misoprostol combined with loperamide and acetaminophen prophylaxis. Contraception. 2001;63:217–221
- Vaginal misoprostol 1000 mcg for early abortion. Contraception. 2001;63:131–136
- . Termination of pregnancies <
6 weeks gestation with a single dose of 800 mcg of vaginal misoprostol. Contraception. 2000;61:47–50 - Misoprostol for abortion up to 9 weeks gestation in adolescents. Eur J Contracpt Reprod Health Care. 2000;5:227–233
- . Early abortion with 800 mcg of misoprostol by the vaginal route. Contraception. 1999;59:219–225
- . The use of misoprostol for abortion at ≤
9 weeks gestation. Eur J Contracpt Reprod Health Care. 1997;2:181–185 - . The use of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy. Contraception. 1997;55:165–168
- . The Brazilian experience with cytotec. Stud Fam Plann. 1993;24:236–240
- . The knowledge, acceptability and use of misoprostol for self-induced medical abortion in an urban US population. JAMWA. 2000;55(S):S183–S185
- . Comparison of abortions induced by methotrexate or mifepristone followed by misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:813–819
- . Oral methotrexate compared with injected methotrexate when used with misoprostol for abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:149–152
- . Comparing abortion induced with methotrexate and misoprostol to methotrexate alone. Contraception. 1999;59:7–10
- . Medical abortion with methotrexate 75 mg intramuscularly and vaginal misoprostol. Contraception. 1997;56:367–371
- . Misoprostol 3, 4, or 5 days after methotrexate for early abortion. Contraception. 1997;56:169–174
- . Methotrexate for early abortion: A multicenter trial. I. Safety and Efficacy. Contraception. 1996;53(6):321–327
- . Abortion induced methotrexate and misoprostol. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154(2):165–170
PII: S0020-7292(06)00446-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.09.009
© 2006 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 96, Issue 3
, Pages 212-218
, March 2007
