Journal Home
Search for

Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages 213-216 (December 2008)


View previous. 5 of 32 View next.

Isosorbide mononitrate versus alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Ashraf F. NabhanCorresponding Author Informationemail addressemail address, Noha H. Rabie

Received 24 June 2008; received in revised form 14 July 2008; accepted 15 July 2008. published online 22 September 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

To compare the effectiveness, safety, and affordability of isosorbide mononitrate with alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial of 60 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg daily of isosorbide mononitrate or 70 mg weekly of alendronate for 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and after 12 months.

Results

Both groups showed significant improvement in BMD. Isosorbide mononitrate yielded a comparable effect to alendronate for BMD and T-score at the end of the follow-up period. For BMD and T score the mean differences between the 2 groups were –0.005 (95% CI, –0.02 to 0.03) and 0.31 (95% CI, –0.03 to 0.64), respectively. A 10.8% and 12.1% change in BMD after 12 months was seen for isosorbide mononitrate and alendronate, respectively.

Conclusion

Isosorbide mononitrate is comparable to alendronate. Nitric oxide donors may be an effective and affordable therapy to improve bone mineral density.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ain Shams, Cairo, Egypt

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 50 Khalifa Almaamoun Street, Clinic 509, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt. Tel.: +20 2 26357966; fax: +20 2 26388082.

PII: S0020-7292(08)00338-X

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.07.011


View previous. 5 of 32 View next.