Volume 103, Issue 3 , Pages 213-216, December 2008
Isosorbide mononitrate versus alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis
Abstract
Objective
To compare the effectiveness, safety, and affordability of isosorbide mononitrate with alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial of 60 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg daily of isosorbide mononitrate or 70 mg weekly of alendronate for 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and after 12 months.
Results
Both groups showed significant improvement in BMD. Isosorbide mononitrate yielded a comparable effect to alendronate for BMD and T-score at the end of the follow-up period. For BMD and T score the mean differences between the 2 groups were –
0.005 (95% CI, –
0.02 to 0.03) and 0.31 (95% CI, –
0.03 to 0.64), respectively. A 10.8% and 12.1% change in BMD after 12 months was seen for isosorbide mononitrate and alendronate, respectively.
Conclusion
Isosorbide mononitrate is comparable to alendronate. Nitric oxide donors may be an effective and affordable therapy to improve bone mineral density.
Keywords: Alendronate, Bone mineral density, Isosorbide mononitrate, Nitric oxide donors, Postmenopausal osteoporosis
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0020-7292(08)00338-X
doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.07.011
© 2008 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 103, Issue 3 , Pages 213-216, December 2008
