International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 109, Issue 3 , Pages 219-222, June 2010

A 10-year experience in removing Chinese intrauterine devices

  • Vincent Y.T. Cheung

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North York General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 20 November 2009; received in revised form 21 December 2009; accepted 25 January 2010. published online 11 March 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

To review 10years of experience in removal of Chinese intrauterine devices (IUD) attained by a single gynecologist practicing in Canada.

Methods

Office records from women who presented requesting IUD removal between January 1999 and December 2008 were reviewed. Specific data including the time of IUD insertion, the country where the IUD was inserted, menstrual and obstetric histories, success of the IUD removal in an office setting, and the type of IUD removed were recorded.

Results

Of 314 women using a Chinese IUD, 227 (72.3%) had successful removal of the device in an office setting. Most women (86.6%) fitted with a Chinese IUD had no thread seen outside the cervix. A total of 279 Chinese IUDs were removed (from both the office setting and operating room), consisting of 11 different types; the most common type was the stainless steel ring (63.4%). Difficult removal was associated with absence of a visible thread outside the cervix, postmenopausal status, and no previous vaginal birth. The type of IUD and duration of placement did not affect the ease of removal.

Conclusion

Knowledge about the different types of Chinese IUDs in use will enable gynecologists to provide optimal care to their patients.

Keywords: Birth control, China, Contraception, Intrauterine device, IUD

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7292(10)00051-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.12.018

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 109, Issue 3 , Pages 219-222, June 2010