International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 109, Issue 3 , Pages 255-258, June 2010

Unethical female stereotyping in reproductive health

  • Rebecca J. Cook

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Simone Cusack

      Affiliations

    • Public Interest Law Clearing House, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Bernard M. Dickens

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 84 Queen's Park, Toronto, Canada M5S 2C5. Tel.: +1 416 978 4849; fax: +1 416 978 7899.

published online 08 March 2010.

Abstract 

Stereotypes are generalized preconceptions defining individuals by group categories into which they are placed. Women have become stereotyped as homemakers and mothers, with the negative effect of precluding them from other roles and functions. Legislation and judicial constructions show a history, and often a continuing practice, of confining women to these stereotypical functions. In access to reproductive and sexual health care, for instance, women's requests have been professionally subject to approval of their husbands, fathers or comparable males. Choice of abortion is particularly significant, because it embeds moral values. Women's capacity to act as responsible moral agents is denied by stereotypical attitudes shown by legislators, judges, heads of religious denominations, and healthcare providers who consider women incapable of exercising responsible moral choice. These attitudes violate ethical requirements of treating patients with respect and equal justice. They can also result in violations of human rights laws that prohibit discrimination against women.

Keywords: Discrimination, Ethics, Human rights, Moral agency, Reproductive health, Sexual health, Stereotyping

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7292(10)00061-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.02.002

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 109, Issue 3 , Pages 255-258, June 2010