International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 110, Issue 3 , Pages 231-234, September 2010

Dating gestational age by last menstrual period, symphysis-fundal height, and ultrasound in urban Pakistan

  • Imtiaz Jehan

      Affiliations

    • Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • ,
  • Shahida Zaidi

      Affiliations

    • Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • ,
  • Sameera Rizvi

      Affiliations

    • Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • ,
  • Naushaba Mobeen

      Affiliations

    • Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • ,
  • Elizabeth M. McClure

      Affiliations

    • Research Triangle Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Breda Munoz

      Affiliations

    • Research Triangle Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Omrana Pasha

      Affiliations

    • Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • ,
  • Linda L. Wright

      Affiliations

    • Eunice Kennedy Shriver, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • Robert L. Goldenberg

      Affiliations

    • Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Received 29 December 2009; received in revised form 25 March 2010; accepted 26 March 2010. published online 01 June 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

To compare the accuracy of the reported date of the last menstrual period (LMP) with that of symphysis-fundal height (SFH) in the estimation of gestational age (GA), using an ultrasound (US) scan as reference.

Methods

Gestational age was concurrently assessed by the 3 methods in this prospective, population-based, pregnancy-outcome study conducted in Hyderabad, Pakistan, from June 18, 2003, through August 31, 2005, with 1128 women between 20 and 26weeks of a singleton pregnancy.

Results

The mean GA was less by ultrasound than by SFH measurement or the reported LMP, and the mean differences with the US result were statistically significant (P<0.001 for both). At delivery, about 75% of the GA values estimated by SFH measurement were within 7days and almost 91% were within 14days of the estimation by ultrasound, compared with 65% and 82% for the GA estimated by the reported LMP. Moreover, using the US as reference, the SFH correctly classified 84% of the term, 68% of the preterm, and 86% of the post-term deliveries (weighted κ=0.58) compared with the corresponding 79%, 61%, and 55% predicted by the reported LMP (weighted κ=0.44).

Conclusion

The SFH measurement was found to be more accurate than the reported LMP as a tool to estimate GA and therefore date of delivery, but neither were as accurate as a US scan.

Keywords: Gestational age, Last menstrual period, Pakistan, Symphysis-fundal height, Ultrasound

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7292(10)00205-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.030

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 110, Issue 3 , Pages 231-234, September 2010