International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 116, Issue 2 , Pages 93-96, February 2012

Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy

  • Wenyan Xi

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
  • ,
  • Fei Gong

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
    • Reproductive and Genetics Hospital of CITIC–Xiangya, Changsha, China
  • ,
  • Yi Tang

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
    • Reproductive and Genetics Hospital of CITIC–Xiangya, Changsha, China
  • ,
  • Hong Zhang

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive and Genetics Hospital of CITIC–Xiangya, Changsha, China
  • ,
  • Guangxiu Lu

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
    • Reproductive and Genetics Hospital of CITIC–Xiangya, Changsha, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Central South University, Changsha 410008, China. Tel.: +86 15874281982; fax: +86 7314497661.

Received 5 May 2011; received in revised form 28 August 2011; accepted 19 October 2011. published online 21 November 2011.

Abstract 

Objective

To evaluate whether laparoscopic salpingectomy compromises ovarian response in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Methods

In a retrospective study in Changsha, China, data from 76 women who underwent ovarian stimulation before and after laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy were compared with those from 80 women who underwent 2 IVF cycles without surgical intervention between 2004 and 2009.

Results

There were no differences in basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or estradiol (E2); length of stimulation; or numbers of follicles, retrieved and fertilized oocytes, or high-quality embryos between the cycles before and after salpingectomy; however, initial and total doses of gonadotropins were significantly increased after surgery (P<0.05). IVF parameters were also comparable between the 2cycles among women without surgical intervention, except for a significant increase in initial and total doses of gonadotropins at the second cycle (P<0.05). IVF parameters did not differ between the cycle subsequent to salpingectomy and the second cycle in women without surgical intervention. There were no significant differences between patients with unilateral and those with bilateral salpingectomy, nor between the operated and non-operated ovary in the same individual.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic salpingectomy had no detrimental effect on ovarian response during IVF–embryo transfer treatment.

Keywords: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, In vitro fertilization, Ovarian response, Salpingectomy, Tubal ectopic pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0020-7292(11)00546-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.009

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume 116, Issue 2 , Pages 93-96, February 2012